Approach

Over the decade from 2010-2020, there appeared to be a slowing of fecundity rates for both the SRKW and NRKW populations. We can examine correlations between those estimated fecundity rates, and aggregate population size.

Fecundity

Estimated fecundity rates for 20-year females in the SRKW population. Ribbons represent 95% CIs.

Figure 1: Estimated fecundity rates for 20-year females in the SRKW population. Ribbons represent 95% CIs.

There is not a clear relationship between declining fecundity rates and SRKW population size, because we see both high and low fecundity rates at low total SRKW population sizes.

Estimated fecundity rates for 20-year females in the SRKW population versus total SRKW population size.

Figure 2: Estimated fecundity rates for 20-year females in the SRKW population versus total SRKW population size.

Given that fecundity rates for both populations are falling over the same period, a better proxy for density dependent effects may be the combined population sizes of SRKW and NRKW animals. This shows a clear declining relationship between fecundity rates and population size. The shape of the relationship is evidence of non-linear density dependence, and is similar to results seen in pinnipeds and large terrestrial mammals.

Combined time series of SRKW + NRKW populations

Figure 3: Combined time series of SRKW + NRKW populations

Estimated fecundity rates for 20-year females in the SRKW population versus combined (SRKW + NRKW) population size.

Figure 4: Estimated fecundity rates for 20-year females in the SRKW population versus combined (SRKW + NRKW) population size.